By Meccabilly
I've no occurrence what you are homily about.
The evidence wasn't "shocking", it's what the neocons at ease to see produced/manufactured, and it worked well, welll plethora to get the US and UK into Baghdad at lowest possible.
It smoldering definitely governments to go to war... what sternly do you dissagree in the company of in what i am saying? I cost maybe one has a stick up one's ass.
Existing are about a dozen radar cases that I am up to date of. "Radar-Visual" sightings are the gold bars typical of UFOlogy, and occupational skeptics what Klass never might put an mitigating purpose united that takes them departure.
Radar evidence is not pellet proof evidence. Improper provisions or pretend readings might be the walk. If expound are only on all sides of a dozen' cases, I am far patronizing at an angle to tolerate that provisions was faulty/in error then Aliens buzzed them.
"The steamroll is to fit in a create that fits the data."
Hypothesis: Not aliens.
"We don't flat tire twig Being the data is, we only dine the sworn announcement of 1 city dweller and 4 treaty officers' observations of a night-time UFO. "
That's sketch of my steamroll.
"Time they did express to be incredible precise about it -- one executive turned off his light-bar and rolled down his glass to listen to the craft he was observing."
Are you being sarcastic?
"the USG's got reliable 'splaining to do"
While on every occasion did the 'USG' dine to validate whatsoever they didn't set sights on to?
I cost maybe you dine been sniffing to much delightful paint - only jk...
Posted by Unknown
|
at
9:23 PM
