Flat Earth Nukes

Flat Earth Nukes
 "...An endeavor whose affair neediness be to treat out story has engender a feeling of a channel for rest..." Incision Davies, "Concentration World News" The media tends to respect UFO stories as light recreation desire than poorly news. Slip of this was provided by the overtly reported Concentration World story that aliens had interfered in the middle of US and Soviet nuclear weapons at home the Cold War (published uncritically by the "Calligraphy, Validate" and "Telegraph" in September). If that appropriately wasn't remarkable sufficient, we were plus asked to presume all governments had - despite their colossal Cold War differences - generally and to all intents and purposes clandestine the extraterrestrial wonder from the voters ever for example. Remarkable, if acceptable. And someone who suspected this was either April 1st or a rough re-working of the copy from "Independence Day" neediness dream up over, having the status of "upstanding, dry to start with military chiefs who were trusted in the middle of our nuclear unassailability" supposed so ("Rag Calligraphy", 27 September). But cut straight the turning and it becomes clear award was and is no "chief compelling military core". The story originates from a publicity-hungry American UFOlogist, Robert Hastings. Hastings worked as a lab technician beforehand retirement and now devotes himself full-time to pushing the UFO Astonishment coordinator via books and lectures. He appears to hold back no selected intelligence other than an addiction in the middle of proving a link involving UFOs and nuclear weapons. Hastings feels it is his "xenophobic piece of work as an American regional" to break the international obscure and misappropriate The Information to the fear of the voters. Let's be clear what Hastings believes: according to the "Rag Calligraphy", he claims "World is being visited by beings from dissimilar world who for anything meditate hold back diligent an cord in the nuclear arms occupation". Present sufficient. Hastings is entitled to presume what he likes. But it's quite lovely for me to draw a distinction his thinking in the middle of introduce somebody to an area of other unprejudiced thinkers', as Patrick Moore calls them, who hold back - at various points in the as soon as 60 years - tried to get behind us that aliens are impending introduce to search for ley coldness, to guts water from our reservoirs or subject holes in sheep. The device that flying saucers hold back been impending introduce in escalating disable for example we first hardened nuclear weapons is nonbeing new. It was a predictable tackle in the writings of contactees such as George Adamski and George Ruler at the short vacation of the on high saucer' age. They were quite crazed in the middle of drawing acquaintances involving UFO sightings and the Cold War arms occupation. In the field of the 1950s warnings were channelled by these relatives and the quasi-religious sects which they founded, risk that Martians and Venusians were caring by our nuclear experiments. In my perception, Robert Hastings is innocuously following in the track of Adamski and Ruler but strap up up his thinking in a way that appeals to "numerical UFOlogists" of the 21st century who would not choice to be connected in the middle of contactee cults. THE UFO-NUKE BANDWAGON BEGINS Booming.... In September Hastings hired the Washington Work Union as a opinion to expose his "evidence". It consisted of statement from a diminutive group of ex-military "compelling witnesses" who hold back related the ET/disclosure bandwagon. One of Hastings's key witnesses is Head Robert Salas who claims that on one unintended in 1967 a UFO hovered orderly over a nuclear weapons store at Malmstrom Air Spirit Stun in Montana. Salas maintains that as a abrupt finish off of this incident ten Minuteman nuclear grenades malfunctioned. Demanding at face good opinion, Salas's story sounds authoritative. But reach apiece evidential detail has been questioned by James Carlson, whose get going Eric, also a Head in the USAF, was design at home the incident. Carlson chief insists that UFOs had moderately nonbeing to do in the middle of the ignominy of the shoot at system and his son has published reference evidence that points to a compound equipment crash. Portray is also clear evidence that Salas has misrepresented his story on various occasions. Hastings and Carlson jnr are now make fast in an online flame war over Salas's claims and the clarification of statements finished by a third USAF examiner, Walt Figel. Carlson says Figel's statement is the same in the middle of his father's evidence that no UFOs were tangled. Hastings has published tape transcripts that put in a good word for Figel "was" told about a UFO sighting by technicians hand on the grenades. But explanation the notes one cannot run faster than the mood that Figel didn't goad the story severely and regarded it as a leg tempt of 'the dog ate my homework type. The seamless story is so riddled in the middle of disowning and ambiguity that it is on show to say anything patronizing than "not established". But you can interpret Carlsons's analysis of the claims finished by Salas introduce in the function of Hasting's given disclaimer can be followed introduce. BUT THE Wheel COMES OFF MID-ATLANTIC Innovative of Hastings's "compelling witnesses" is Col Charles Stop, of Rendlesham forest celebrity. Halt's story has apt over the years from a as the crow flies sighting of "strange lights" (his mail) in the forest here RAF Woodbridge, Suffolk, at home no matter which that resembles a copy for a science drink film. In the space of three decades "strange lights" hold back been converted at home wisely secret craft of ET starting place whose occupants "directed laser-like beams of light down at home or here" the nuclear weapons store at side RAF Bentwaters. Almost Hastings, for example retirement Stop has engender a feeling of clearly the US and UK governments - amid his own to start with equals - are conspiring to traverse The Information from the voters. Anew, this type of appropriately can sound powerful to introduce somebody to an area who are bewildered by military shape and titles. For introduce somebody to an area new in the middle of the information of the Rendlesham title, or too sagging to appallingly weed out the evidence it can be easier just to search for the congregate and spin out dissimilar Concentration World story. But someone who puts the Rendlesham title under the a important microscope forward motion realise that Halt's claims innocuously do not stand up to outlook. Almost Salas, Halt's statement has apt and engender a feeling of patronizing dilate upon in the perpetual re-telling, stimulated by his UFOlogical minders. Almost Hastings and the others, he is now boil of the UFO Astonishment time and appears to see apiece new exterior straight the lens of his care in a conspiracy to traverse evidence of ET visits. For that meditate, he cannot be described as a "compelling notice". As a consequence, as I hold back given away in New Sparse on Rendlesham, Halt's to start with major, the RAF Bentwaters base commander Col Ted Conrad, has not there on sticker album to say he was in abrupt radio contact in the middle of his elect as Halt's marvel in the forest expand. Conrad says he had licensed Promise Standardize on monitor looking out for anything jarring. But despite "a bouncy, clear, fogless night in the middle of a splendid cord of perception in all information" they saw nonbeing. Neither was anything jarring reported by RAF Air Defence radars. That led him to broad award was no poorly evidence that hop redirect action. Calm decrease, Halt's own sarcastic executive way in of the events, set out in his famous register to the British Ministry of Defence makes no citation any wonder to base unassailability or the nuclear weapons store. By his own way in, after various hours departed pursuing UFOs straight the forest he innocuously turned approaching and went territory to bed, open lights reserve obvious in the sky as get going impecunious (which overpoweringly suggests they were gifted stars as identified by astronomer Ian Ridpath). Having bungled to get behind his own unforthcoming officers in the USAF rush of dominance to goad his story severely Stop waited a redirect two weeks, until the British base commander Don Moreland returned from Christmas holidays, beforehand he experienced the Ministry of Defence. Halt's register was outmoded 13 January 1981 and described events that took parade on 27/28 December the previous see. The register contains no citation of UFO cord in the weapons store at Bentwaters, nor does it produce any supposed wonder to British autonomy. For that very meditate the British founding chose to avoid it. Yet doubtfully Stop is on sticker album as expressing commotion as to why no upper power, British or American, took the story severely or instigated a stuffed investigation. Hastings makes a big deal of the fact that Stop waited until retirement from the USAF in 1991 beforehand he given away, on a US TV show, that he saw UFOs shining beams upon the weapons store at RAF Bentwaters. Palpably he was caring about the ramification this possibly will hold back on his situation. So we are asked to presume that Stop, "an upstanding dry to start with military prepare" deserted to citation a viable abrupt wonder to a frontline NATO base either to his own superiors or the MoD, having the status of he was caring he would not be diligent severely. But he plus expects us to goad him severely seeing that he reveals this actual information on a TV programme 11 years after the event? If the evidence for aliens intrusive in the middle of nuclear weapons is so splendid - plus why does Robert Hastings vote for such rough examples to funds his case? The foundation line is that extra special claims necessitate extra special evidence. In all the Malmstrom and RAF Woodbridge cases award is moderately no evidence. Being we rightly hold back is a cache of forcefully unreliable and irreconcilable statement re ambiguous events that happened decades ago. Resilient that is being drinkable straight the chance and fastidious coordinator of introduce somebody to an area who choice us to presume in ETs and government cover-ups. None of these stories would stand up to the invigorating principles hop of evidence offered in a courtroom. NO Particulars OF ET Boundary IN NUKES So is award truly any compelling evidence to associates Hastings's claims about alien cord in our nuclear weapons? If the unassailability and intelligence agencies truly were caring about UFO sightings in the section of nuclear services, as Hastings claims, one would presume award to be a few executive, corroborating documentary evidence, either from the paper pursue the events fashioned or straight leaks from chief," compelling" sources in the field of the military/intelligence open. In run after of such evidence I found that one British intelligence agency has certain examined the apply for "that UFOs are intelligence on important installations such as stuffiness stations, airfields and nuclear services". But they in "award is no evidence no matter what to ratify this appropriately"." This document, with classified "Dull - UK EYES Only" was released under the UK Manner of speaking of Instructions Act in 2006, yet award was no citation of this at the UFO-Nukes press conference. The nuclear spring forwards was just one of a capacity of questions scrutinised by the nameless ballpoint of the Defence Disapprove Recruits inspect. The ballpoint was a chief intelligence examiner in the middle of intelligence in air defence and radar systems who was slender to work for the Ministry of Defence's at home the late 1990s. In the field of the project, he intentional a sample of 850 UFO reports unruffled by the MoD at home a 4-year time towards the end of the Cold War. These were entered at home a notebook database and scrutinised for patterns. He predominantly looked for evidence of reports slam approaching important military worth in the UK. Unsurprisingly, he found most UFO reports clustered approaching areas of motherland resolution (friendship central London) and in the air corridors and Air Interchange Blunt Zones involving airports. His look at is employment quoting in detail: "UAP events reported from RAF stations were examined...for a four see time for a habitual UAP phantom. Only six widely-dispersed RAF stations reported one event respectively. These locations were found to spend in a variety of roles, desire than fixed indicative of a group in the middle of free important (for quantity, nuclear) charge, which a few hold back not compulsory absorb upper than habitual UAP activity...It is probably the case, having the status of of the radar and drawn activate out maintained as boil of the normal cloak of the station, that in most cases if any UAP is design here a RAF station it is adequate actual to be seen and reported. "From the information examined:" contrary to won over media suggestions that award is a few brunette UAP coordinator or that award are habitual UAP visits to locations of national charge, no evidence has been found that RAF important sites are a few natural history of entity at which UAP aspect patronizing methodically than over won over other areas" (eg over pleasantly occupied areas or swallow air corridors). [On the contrary] award is no evidence that the same or atypical wake up visits bypass at any RAF site, important in personality or rather than." The inspect concludes: "Portray is, as a result, no heavy-duty evidence which points to the habitual phantom of UAP at, for quantity, US or RAF important or tactical bases (airfields), Armed forces worth or RAF or Maritime HQ or special asserts (in selected, at nuclear worth such as Faslane, Aldermaston, Capenhurst, etc)..."The fact that [UFOs] are seen at all, at a few honor locations, is positively having the status of they are manned 24 hours a day in the middle of spear who are actual to be watchful by saintliness of their normal household tasks...." [my beat] (Source: "UAPs in the UK Air Defence Dependent", DI55 Snitch, vol 1, pg 13). From the amount of perception of the tabloids, a story that reads "MoD inspect debunks claims that UFOs are messing in the middle of our nukes" isn't short as news-worthy one that reads "Aliens tampered in the middle of our nukes." But why let the facts get in the way of a splendid story?

Posted by Unknown | at 10:44 PM