Ufo Sighting In Arkansas On July 4Th 2011 I Snap A Picture Of One Of Those Beings In The Ship Befor It Took Off
Showing posts with label organoiodides. Show all posts
Showing posts with label organoiodides. Show all posts
Unknown Object Was Photographed Hovering Over Ontario Canada
Hessdalen Ufo Models Sightings Of Cigar Shaped Crafts
"Friday 17th March 1982 I went up to "Hessdalen" along with a couple of friends. Our equipment, which was packed as for an expedition to the polar regions, was loaded carefully on a snowmobile sled.At 19.32 we were interrupted by someone shouting, "There it is!" We dropped what we held in our hands, and ran out on the road. An elongated bright object was passing slowly in front of mount Finnsahogda on its way north, - so that the mountain could be seen as a backdrop.We had barely arrived at the "Promised Valley", and there "it" was!The equipment was transported to the mountain farm, as we drove back to Aspaskjolen where other people stood and "stared". We soon learned that more people had seen "it", and that they had not heard any sound.At 20.39 a similar object returned in the same route, but this time from north to south. I was able to register three points of light, of which one was red. The object turned to the south-west, above the mountain with moderate speed. The camera equipment was on the scooter sleigh, and probably almost halfway to the farm by now... Drawing: Leif HavikAt 23 o'clock we arrived at the farm.In the hours that followed, we unpacked the equipment and watched the night sky. We soon realized that there were many planes, and there were lots of satellites. There was otherwise no trouble hearing the sound of planes - and into the night, there was almost no passages. It was a peaceful and quiet night, in an equally peaceful "paradise" that Finnsadalen soon was named.Next morning, we walked around the "foot" of Finnsahogda, and found an excellent observation post in about the hight of 690 meters. Here we would establish ourselves for the night.At 19 o'clock we were ready to begin observing. It goes with the story that these lights were so precise regarding the time - that people began to mention the passages as "routs" or "flights". The clock struck 19:30 and we were waiting for "the half past seven flight".More stars appeared, and it cleared up. There!... - A star-like light appeared in the south. It came over the horizon, but only emerged as jack in the box. The time was 19.33. The light became "warmer" and it was approaching fast. We could see that it was elongated and that it had at least two yellow-white lights and a red light. The red light was placed above the object. Could it be a plane? No. - We could hear no sound, - and it came ever closer. Cameras were ready, and we shot a few pictures. The lights were passing slowly to the north.We noted that there was only a kind of "dead" light. It seemed blurred and dull, and none of us had seen such a light before.Camera with 400 ASA film and 270 mm telephoto lens was used. Of course it was mounted on a tripod, and through the lens, I could only see a small point of light. It was just to shoot and hope for luck. The object's passage deserves further comment. Distance to the top of the mountain which the object passed in front of, is just under 2000 meters, and we could see that the object disappeared behind the nearest peak of Finnsahogda. Thus, it would imply that the object's passage had to be at a distance of approximately 17 to 1800 meters, and the height of the passage about 980 meters.After the lights disappeared behind the mountain, we saw it again just seconds later - when it came in a nice turn from the west along the mountain edge, after which it again disappeared behind the mountains. It did, in other words, an extra loop before continuing to the north. But this time only the red light could be seen, and the other two yellow-white lights were turned off. I have since seen the same phenomenon on several occasions, and I'm sure it could not be plane, balloon, planet or a light reflection.After this incident we were silent, everyone trying to find an explanation. But we soon had to give up. However, we were sure that no airplane could do such maneuvers only a few meters above the mountain plateau. At 19.58 we became aware of another floating "star". It came at exactly the same "route" as the previous one, and it had the same speed. As it came closer, it assumed a more yellowish color, and later more orange-red. This was also photographed before it disappeared to the north. The light seemed like a flickering "flame", and had diffuse contours.The next day we also had two observations of nearly the same type. At 19.38 and 19.50 some bright objects passed to the north in almost the same "route" as before, but no photos were taken. "SAME" OBJECT ONCE AGAIN:From Varhuskjolen I saw a similar lighted object like the previous observations.We were four people standing on Varhuskjolen when "it" came north at 19.42. It passed above the mountain and went down the north side of this mountain. After a while it suddenly disappeared in direction of the Haltdalen area. Others who saw it said that it passed in the same hight as Varhus, - 610 meters. Same object?At 20.50 "it" came back from the north, but this time it passed east of Finnsahogda. It rose immediately after the passage of the mountain, and disappeared into the clouds at about 14 to 1500 meters altitude. The object was illuminated, with a red light in front. There was no sound. Attempts to photograph failed.The 21. October we were back.. At 21.13 came "our" oblong object. It passed north of the mountain, before it suddenly disappeared. Four minutes later a similar object passed to the south, east of Finnsahogda. It followed Hessdalen south in regular orbit and speed. The observations took place in clear weather, and there was no wind. No sound could be heared. Attempts to take photographs failed this time as well.A HISSING SOUND:The 26. October, I went up to Hessdalen again with a friend. We arrived Varhuskjolen at 19.35. There were two representatives of UFO Sweden there which had stood there all day without seeing anything special.We had barely enough time to stop the car, before a light appeared. We popped out of the car, as if shot from a catapult seat - and there was our "cigar" again! This time it was properly illuminated, and it moved slowly to the north. It had a clear red light in front, and it was moving in a slow, wave-like motion. It also had a very rough path. This time it passed so far to the east, that it passed almost directly above where we stood, and although it was impossible to determine the height, it could possibly not be more than 1000 meters, or in other words up to 300 meters above us.Since it passed so close, it was for the first time possible to hear sound. It was a kind of hissing sound, which can be compared with the sound of high voltage cables in wet weather.I have been struggling to find a description of the visual observation, and the closest I can come to - is that it resembled a huge glowing ash flake that flew with the wind.
Source: chupacabra-digest.blogspot.com
Ufo Advocates Stirred Up
Attendees of the 14th ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL UFO CONGRESS CONVENTION and FILM FESTIVAL held March 6-12, 2005 in Laughlin, Nevada talked openly of having expected too much. Clearly distraught, disclosure enthusiasts were united in expressing their feelings of betrayal and of expecting to much. They expected Peter Jennings Special ABC News Report on UFOs to at least leave non-believers with a positive impression of this often disputed topic. However, even with such convincing research, photos, and documentation as was made available to the show's producers to utilize by legitimate investigators, ABC still elected not to use most of the best material.
"The first hour of the broadcast was great," said one disappointed viewer. "Then, in the second half, they turned it around in such a way as to leave millions undecided. ABC's experts were skeptical of eye-witness sightings, and discounted any official cover-up or disinformation agenda regarding UFOs, extraterrestrials, flying saucers, and alien abductions by our government."
In startling contrast to the Jennings' report with its convenient, "Computer generated animation's" the well informed 700 UFO Congress attendees saw "Real time/dated video footage." A presentation showing hundreds of UFOs, extraterrestrial, or alien aerial craft was presented by Mexico's most respected, "60 Minutes", "Sunday To Sunday", and "ECO" anchor & prestigious journalist, Jaime Maussan.
Maussan was but one of the over one-dozen distinguished speakers, scientists, researchers, UFO investigators, retired military analysts, renowned authors, university professors, and internationally acclaimed experts, assembled from around the world, who presented conclusive evidence of frequent alien visitations to Planet Earth.
The International view was overwhelmingly positive in agreement that UFOs are real and the implications of their growing willingness to allow themselves to be filmed is another indication that the populace of this planet needs to be brought up to speed.
The Safespace News Agency, a reality based video News Magazine has been established on the premise that THE MAINSTREAM NEWS IS THE COVER-UP!
According to Safespace North American producer, Robert D. Miles, "Our journalists at http://SafespaceProject.com are ready to debunk the debunkers," he promised. "We are preparing to tell the world the real story of what is really going on, on a planetary basis. Viewers will see our world as it really is, not as they are currently being told it is, by the mainstream media. The UFO truth is coming out there..."
In the near future, stirred-up UFO advocates may not be let-down.
Russ Miles is author of the novel, For Sale By Owners:FSBO. A Seasoned Real Estate NAR(R) Broker, disabled by Multiple Sclerosis, writes books & articles on varied subjects. Google russ miles. FOR SALE BY OWNERS:FSBO ISBN 0-595-28703-4,in trade paperback, is available by phone or Internet:1-800-Authors to order direct! Adobe e-book & hard cover editions also available FSBO at Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and other fine booksellers. Comments: MilesRuss@Gmail.com.[Visit soulful-writer.com [http://soulful-writer.com]]
Us Government To Admit Ufo Visitation Is Real In 2010
The Wheels of Come upon Scoff been in endorse since the offspring 70s, Movies Be fond of Cork Encounters, ET,2001 A Time out Odyssey, were all meant to get the regular asking "what if" And as the soul spell misplaced by ET'S Aliens and UFO'S spell been a big divorce of the gala concern, Consecutive for children gala is based on alien famine beings point out a manifestation on TV and in the shops,Its all acquaint with to get Relations cast-off to the assemble,The plan is that the category of the 60s who are now adults who spell been brought up between the assemble and spell brought acquaint with category up between alien information tendency without delay accept the approach having the status of it happens, but first acquaint with tendency be excellent announcements from the Vatican and visions in the sky to take the tenacious along with us inwards the line of care, Come upon 2010 almost a influence.....
The Eth Vs Well Everything Were Still Stuck
PARANORMALITY
Currently (though not for the first time) on several ufo blogs, like Posthuman Bluesand UFO Mystic, The Other Side of Truth, etc. there's an lively discussion on the ETH (extraterrestrial hypotheses) vs. other theories and how it compares/contrasts to their UFOlogical ideas. The cause for the most recent collection of discussions is Mac Tonnies, author of the Posthuman Blues blog, new cryptoterrestrail hypothesis (or, 'CTH.') Before the CTH, and very likely after the CTH wans a bit, the debate will still go on between the extraterrestrial hypothesis and, well, everything else.The ETH is often refered to as "paranormal." I've been writing for the past year and a half or so on this blog that extraterrestrials (always assuming they exist of course, which I think they do) are "not" paranormal, and that the "answer" is more than one thing. Often it appears that way to us; we interpret the effects of their craft, the entities, and what they're doing as paranormal. Experiences such as psi or esp (as I've experienced), and precognitive dreams related to the events,(something I've also experienced) for examples, can be said to be "paranormal." But "if" most of UFO events are caused by ETs, it's doubtful they're "paranormal." They're not any more "paranormal" than one group of humans from one culture encountering another unknown, and very different group of humans from another.
And yet.
How do we explain the so-called "paranormal" aspects of many a UFO encounter? Is the answer mere coincidence? "Magick?" Or stupendous technology? Probably the latter, in the case of ET.
Because ET is not paranormal, does not mean that there is no paranormal aspect to the UFO phenomena.
RELIGION-OSITY
Many critics of the ETH and most all skeptics (or 'cultural skeptics, to use Colin Bennett's term) attack so-called 'believers' in the ETH as taking on a new form of religion. The argument tells us that "belief" in ET is merely the same thing as believing in Jesus Christ or God and therefore, silly, since none of those exist. (Or if not "silly" then still a non-issue, since there is no proof of either, it's faith based. In the context of UFOs, since it's "faith based" there's no need for serious investigation.)
We all know there are those who do believe that ET is not only more technology advanced, but also ethically and spiritually advanced. They'll save us, teach us the way, show us what to do. Once they land and announce themselves openly, it will all get better. No more poverty, wars or global warming. Replace Jesus, God or the promise of glorius ever lasting life with ET and it's still religion. Faith and trust Faith in their existence as "real" and trust in what they tell us is true.
Those people aside, to present an acceptance of the ETH, or acknowledge its likelihood as some sort of new religion is inaccurate. I am of the opinion ET exists, and clearly they're more technology advanced. It does not follow however that their technological 'superpowers' makes them also superior to us ethically, morally or spiritually. And it doesn't mean they're here to save, heal, or teach us. (If anything, they make me a bit nervous; I don't trust the spindly things.)
Debates about ET often become stagnant pretty quickly because of this divine/religious/spiritual aspect. Lines have been drawn; they're magikal-magical-mystical, or they're none existent. There is a third angle; the nuts and bolts theorists, who usually don't involve themselves with this aspect, and that's a good thing. However, the problem sometimes is that the anomalous high strangeness, or 'Oz' factors (term coined by UFO researcher Jenny Randles) often encountered in UFO events are ignored.
THE ET
Often when discussing ET it's presented as one, a singular, individual thing. We use 'ET' as shorthand, but we often run into problems in doing so. ET becomes almost a cartoon like figure or a comic book hero. One individual, representing all UFO events. Many types of 'aliens" have been described, there are numerous websites about the different races and forms of extraterrestrials, all kinds of beings have been encountered and assumed to be from space. Still, the semantics used when discussing ET, or the ETH, has a lot to do with what we "think" of ET.
PARANORMALITY, RELIGOUSITY, THE ET: UH -OH
Now we've run into trouble. Technology is interpreted as paranormal, expectations, desires and need create a religion, and we have the danger of thinking of ET as a sort of non-human (or possibly part human) comic book hero. (Or villain; I mean, take a look at the Reptilians.) But there "is" a very weird component to a lot of UFO sightings, in fact, to a lot of UFOlogy itself. From the description of entities, to their behavior, to the characteristics of craft, to what has happened to the witnesses, to those who study UFOs,... it all gets very weird very fast, and we can't find a neat box to put the parts -- technology, behavior, entity -- into.
Which brings us to:
ETH VS.... EVERYTHING: OR, HI, I'M YOUR DICHOTOMY
I'm always surprised and a little exasperated when I still come across intense debates (often degenerating to name calling, sarcasm and sneering) about which is the 'answer' to the UFO enigma. "Sides are quickly taken, and little consideration is given to this: THAT THE UFO PHENOMENA IS MORE THAN ONE "THING." This has been one of my main points about UFOlogy since I've been blogging,longer, actually. With some exceptions, many UFO researchers, witnesses and the mainstream man or woman in the street, take sides. It's "either" ET, or it's "either" some sort of Trickster, 'cryptoterrestrail (a la Tonnies) or Ultraterrestrial (as with Vallee), or 'daemons' (Harpur) but it seems that there is basic "need" to take sides, to choose one possibility and stick with it.
The idea that "both" exist; ETs from space, as well as earth bound, terrestrial entities, and that "both" are in this dance we call the UFO phenomeana is too often rejected by many interested in UFOs, from the UFO investigator to the UFO witness.
Possibly it has something to do with human psychology; we need to have these rigid lines drawn so we don't get confused. It's certainly neater; choose one, and go with it. It's easier, trying to figure out what's going in the context of UFOs is difficult enough without having to bring in so-called esoteric theories. It " is" kind of crazy making in a way. But we can't continue to ignore or dismiss other ideas simply because it's easier to handle just one.
BOTHNESS
I've wondered if some extraterrestrials are aware of the non-human "ultra' terrestrials, if one mimics the other at times, and if the ultras, or cryptos -- take your pick -- are aware of various ETs. Whether or not that's the case, it seems just as likely as any other theory that both exist, and both are active. And, as diverse as the ET population is purported to be, the same could be said for the earth bound entities. And taking off on a tangent from "that" angle; we can question whether or not all these entities are manifestations of a larger, single force, or just some of them are, or if they're unique unto themselves...
There's also this idea: is it correct to call ETs strictly "ET," and/or terrestrial bound entities strictly non-human? Folklore and myth contain a wealth of stories of mortal/immortal beings; of humans that are "also" more than 'just' human.
None of these things are exclusive to one another.
MEANWHILE...
I think that the Trickster is an inherent part of the UFO phenomeana. (George P. Hansen makes a brilliant case for this in his book The Trickster and the Paranormal.) Part of this can be seen by the very fact such debates over the ETH vs. Anything Else take place ad naseum. While we're busily and neatly dissecting sections of the phenomeana and deciding that theses pieces are the only ones that 'work,' ignoring all else, the phenomeana continues on its merry way. It's all at once behaving elusively, bizarrely, illogically. (or what appears to be so to us.) It presents us with solid evidence -- radar, ground evidence, etc. -- while at the same time appearing murky, blurry and blobby on videos and photographs. It takes people to Venus, abducts them from their beds. Or at least, it has some of us believing that that's what happened, while others debate what "really" happened around us.
THE THEORY TANGLE
Within this debate comes -- often presented as an accusation -- that a theory, idea, or hypothesis doesn't have any proof. (While the three are not accurately interchangeable, I will use them loosely here to mean the roughly the same thing. ) All we have within UFOlogy and its cousins: Forteana, religions, the paranormal, is speculation. I will amend that to say we have elements of solid evidence sprinkled throughout; documents, for example. But since the phenomeana is so vast and multilayered, we have to ask: what are these proof "of?" (And do we trust the sources and the information?)
It is all right to speculate. Of course, there's "wild" speculation, and we run into problems when those who confuse speculation with fact and proof insist they have the truth. But we need speculation; like the often dreaded anecdotal evidence, without either we wouldn't have anything.
EXPECTATIONS
I think that some of us expect a one size fits all answer. We expect that ET, ultraterrestrails, angels, demons, the fairy folk, UFOs, aliens, entities are behaving logically. We expect them to have a reasonable machine, a reasonable technology, a reasonable reason for appearing to us. We expect that there is really only one category: it's ET, it's angels/demons, it's the government. We expect that these beings will heal us, fix us, give us a new kind of magic. We expect full disclosure. We expect that we can trust; that if we see on the news ET just landed,it's the truth.
Not everyone thinks like this of course, but enough to keep these debates going, even after all this time.
THE BALL
There needs to be a willingless among all who study UFOs to acknowlege -- and " use" -- the idea that the UFO phenomean is at all times "dynamic" and ever shifting, full of multiple possibilites. At times various possibilities shift forward while others stay back, only to switch places again.
Without this model constantly in hand, it is difficult to see how much progress can be made within UFOlogy. The stubborn belief that it all can be solved with just a simplistic, narrow nose to the grindstone, purely 'nuts and bolts' (or paper trail) approach seems almost willfully ignorant.
This is "not" to say we don't need this kind of approach. We absolutely do. The point isn't that this approach is invalid; it isn't. The point is this: without holding this 'ball of possibilites, while utlizing this approach (or any approach) we simply will not get anywhere in UFOlfogy.
Glowing Football Ufo 100 To 200 Feet Wide Flew Over The Highway At Amesbury Massachusetts
"The Vike Reflection (Brian Vike) http://the-v-factor-paranormal.blogspot.com/"
"Sightings.com website: http://www.sightings.com/"
Paranormal Unknown Object Was Photographed Hovering Over Ontario Canada
Hi my nickname is Shane, my son Jacob and i were separation on a cycle track by the river to go fishing. So, we brought the camera in case we caught a lure or whatever thing else that was out of the sun. At the back of detection a turtle and rob pictures of it, we noticed it was accomplishment late violently 9:00pm so, we sober to plus. Biking take up on the groove ownership West i happened to turn my head to the North and saw this very acute ominous object in the sky which appeared over the church in the far deep space (the higest mountain in the metropolitan area) approx 1-2 km ready from us in excess of the church but, it seemed press forward ready than that and a few hundred feet high credibly a thousand. At first i belief it was a hot air cloud but, i've seen persons early and i knew it wasn't that so, We watched it to see if it was elate but it didn't go up or down or side ways it appeared to be more readily energetic in one spot,in arms array it would be the degree of a chubby asprine but less significant than a dime.after performance it for a few account i remembered i had my camera so i took two pictures zoomed in at 14 grow old but it calm wasn't draw to a close sufficiently to see and over in the same way as the camera. I told my son we crave to get closer to it to get a recuperate picture! he didn't need to but, we sober to go to the send off vestibule to get closer apprx 1-1 1/2 punish cycle track seeing that we got communicate it was later than, secret message in the sky at all. My dint was "what the!" where did it go? I peculiar seen this type of object early inn a lot chubby and in a match metropolitan area but, this time i had a picture! to show what we saw.Architect (source: mufon)LUS 2010, 6/6/10, Most Stream UFO Sighting Reports, EVIDENCES AND PROOFS. Concrete UFOS ON NET FROM NORTHERN AMERICA, NEW OVNI Footage PHOTOS, Movie, Images.
Bang ON THE PHOTOS TO ENLARGE!
Ufo Sighting In Northglenn Colorado On October 5Th 2014 While We Watched This Object Pass Over Head
UFO News
UFO News on Facebook
Eviland
News Individual For You
Origin: unexplored-earth.blogspot.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
