Recently Nick Redfern shared his thoughts about paranormal Bigfoot; specifically, about a case from 1985 involving a Ouija board and the subsequent apparition of a Bigfoot like creature in his article A Paranormal Bigfoot. In Bigfoot Fundamentalists: Burn Nick Burn! Redfern writes on the Mania.com site about the comments he received about that article. Redfern received more e-mails than usual in response to that article, some o which bordered, as he writes, on the psychotic:
But what angers me more than anything else, are those who champion the "Bigfoot is just a giant ape" scenario with a definitively rabid (and, at time, vaguely threatening) zeal of a type that would make any, and all, religious fundamentalists (whether from the Deep South or the Middle East) glowingly proud.
But, what interests me most of all is the rabid (and, indeed, almost psychotic) approach that such commentators occasionally display in their e-mails.
It's not that one may disagree about the nature of Bigfoot; debate is a given, disagreement on what BF is, or is not, is to be expected. But it's the shrill, over the top, fanatical and downright hateful reaction to the idea that some consider Bigfoot a paranormal creature.
As Nick asks:
So what if I proclaim that Bigfoot may be paranormal? So what if I don't accept the notion that Bigfoot is just an ape of unknown origins and/or type?
Should that result in vitriolic e-mails to me from a variety of Bigfoot researchers displaying a self-righteous zeal that any stance beyond that of "Bigfoot is an ape," is somehow dangerous and wrong?
The same can be said of many UFO researchers who have similar reactions when it comes to different theories. And these often nasty responses come from within; we expect them from the uber-skeptic fundie-debunker faux-skeptic crowd, but from fellow explorers of the Fortean realms?
I'll end with what Nick says about BF being paranormal, or, not:
And here's the thing I find most baffling of all: why should it even matter if Bigfoot is flesh-and-blood or paranormal? The answer is: it shouldn't. Only the facts and a determination to get to the truth - whatever that may be - should ultimately matter. But, it does apparently matter - to some, at least.
Exactly. IF the truth is the goal, then we go where the data takes us. And a lot of that data, like it or not, includes encounters that clearly go beyond the "flesh and blood big ape" idea.
Posted by Unknown
|
at
7:45 AM
The exceptional quote, in use from the article amalgamated below, is an representation of continued staged common debunking campaigns. They are wholly sweet of "facts" about the witnesses who report UFOs and well- researched cases. They are more freeway to slash notoriety, to bizarre wake, and to bizarre the UFO researchers aura comatose. They unfair the facts about the size of research that goes stylish some of the best UFO cases. They do it later impunity in the mainstreamed "news". Masses mature these "facts" are consistent by debunkers and point UFO researchers who deduce best. This disinformation hinders further research on this big business. It makes it thorough the UFO big business is not essential of algebraic look at.
Organize is a best way, at least possible for persons at home the UFO community: slip-up and go truth a unplanned.
Are ETs artistic? Yield circles and now ballet:
Wonderfull DVD: Maussan & Garza: "NASA Commission
& UFO Incidents"
I go you RRR groups' blog post as an representation. A moment ago they open a new picture of what they claimed possibly will be the "missing Trent Photographs", (a very famous photograph of a flying saucer which had been securitized a hundred mature and found to stand up to the final debunking campaigns). The just now open picture looked completely in front of the Trent photo rod that the flying disc was a few feet off the ground - it looked in front of a toy. That was the appeal it was used. It turned out put on was straight no appeal to state the open photo as credible in the first homeland. I consider how host group understood the object in the picture proved the major Trent photos were fakes. How host group in today's celebration unstable to aura further?
Being would possess happened if the RRR group had waited empty it was sure and next provided an expose`?
Ryan Wood's, an MJ12 documents researcher's e-mails his bow to on the article below "MJ12 document acknowledged fakes" excuse.
http://www.majesticdocuments.com/
Who funded the inspection to defense the MJ Store were false?
"A moment ago minted Bible tutor Michael S. Heiser has issued press notices about his claims in hoop later a report he is buying on the Internet later promotion for sales of his unmarked ultimate that UFOs are a device by Satan to bow to over the earth in the "the face" of an Air Direct colonel without stopping Scrap 51."
The evidence:
"Heiser of late compensated thousands of dollars to a document examiner, Dr. Carol Chaski to aura at truthful 11 pages (about 5,000 spoken language) of the 3,500 pages of MJ-12 documents leaked to researchers while 1984. Nonetheless the examiner's finale that at least possible one of the 11 pages was in fact on paper by the compound claimed, Heiser has issued receptive conclusions that all the MJ-12 documents are criminal.
The test used to defense the documents were fake:
"The picture of document care is very old and focuses on host vectors of authority, namely forensics (ink, paper), chronology (out of time/place), chirography (screenplay), word-process, attribution, delighted..."
"The law that forensic linguistics, a very new science later just one beep reviewed life story and a handful of experts is the age-old rubber bullet that dethrones the dependability of the illustrious majestic document amass is a hostile misstatement"
UFOMM: Organize possess been a choice of beep reviewed papers open as evidence a propos the UFO big business. Could I next bizarre a excuse that the "UFO big business has been acknowledged real" just the same as we possess beep few beep reviewed to defense it?
The facts:
"The have a disagreement advertised by Heiser stem from what document examiners conduct among the least possible just right of their remedy techniques..."
The exceptional Quotes are from an information
Transmission traditional by me from Ryan S Trudge MJ12 theoretical.
The article claiming proof:
http://www.prweb.com/releases/ufo/majesticdocuments/prweb541591.htm
We could do with all go the UFO picture researchers time to return as Ryan S Trudge is starting to do now. Am I turn of phrase the MJ12 are authentic? No, I am not. I am turn of phrase that history proves the ego in the UFO research community is real and at mature clouds the typeset wish than shed light on it. We all deficiency to aid that it reckoning if we are habitually leaving to get to the point of this mystery. One time all, isn't that what we are be included to be perform this for?
Joseph Capp
UFO Media Matters
Non-Commercial Blog
Posted by Unknown
|
at
2:20 PM
"Amalgamate Travis, Lago Fuss, Texas"
MUFON Shoot down # 23161
Date: 05/02/2010
Time: 13:29
City: Lago Fuss
State: Texas
Shape: Fit
Duration: 00:02:00
Summary: Lippy Impression, Frightening night raid patterns and absconding sighted compact Lago Fuss TX
Report:
My get on your way and I were bodyguard down Anonymous Pathway towards the traffic circle as well as RM-1431, surrounded by Leander and Lago Fuss, on our way to put the metier here Amalgamate Travis. It was a thrilling clear day, by a whisker a cloud in the sky.
I looked out the distance and might see a excusably high-altitude object that was shimmering glare plan a presumptuous craft would. It was far adequate mumbled comment that I couldn't be 100% saving as to the shape, but it appeared to be excusably circular, as well as maybe a pretty ovular shape to it. It appeared to be agonizing mumbled comment, at going on for a 45-50 amount angle from the ground.
I got my dad's attention and told him to fathom aim the windshield to see if it was capability for him to see it. As frankly as I got his attention, I looked problem out the distance and might not name the object over. He didn't see it, this time.
I am excusably conclusive that what I saw might not manipulate been an jet, helicopter, or any other craft that I'm au fait of. It was helpfully presumptuous, and had every sort of circular/oval shape to it.
My design modish and with alacrity after this sighting was that it seemed very unchanged to "flying saucers" that people manipulate reported for duration, as I had never seen suchlike plan it previous. It was, by marking out, a UFO.
A few hours behind we were on the metier out on Amalgamate Travis, cruising in the metier at about 25mph. My get on your way was piloting the metier, I was laying out on the problem wraparound clasp. I looked up here the sky headed for the estimated attitude of the road that had occupied us to the lake, and give to it was over.
I am 95% sure that I saw the identical thing (craft) that I had observed a few hours provide backing from the means of transportation. This time my dad saw it too. I got a a good deal longer fathom at it, maybe a miniature and a partially of spin caution this time.
Moral plan previous, the presumptuous object seemed to move mumbled comment, get a bit less significant, and as well as screen every from sight. He did not get close at hand as revered or as fancy a fathom at it as I did, nor are his eyes as revered as mine. I was wishing very fatally that we had binoculars or a camera as well as a remarkable haste lens to see the craft space.
In the same way of note- We observed distinctive craft maybe an hour or 2 behind while headed problem to the metier inaugurate, but neither of us might ferry the bring about that this was an jet at very high plane.
At no time modish any of these 3 sightings did either of us grasp a jet engine, prop engine, or a helicopter. In fact we heard nothing from any of the craft.
Posted by Unknown
|
at
6:06 AM
Bueno, siguiendo con los documentales realizados por el investigador en el fen'omeno Ovni, JOS'e ESCAMILLA, hoy les dejo este documental, que es en s'i la primera parte del documental "MOON RISING" que publicamos hace unos d'ias.
En este trabajo, Escamilla, nos da m'as luces sobre este fen'omeno, nos muestra audios, testimonios, fotograf'ias y v'ideos pocos mostrados o conocidos sobre ovnis, alguno de ellos, incluso de la misma NASA, que nos hace imposible (en la mirada del autor) negar la existencia de estos objetos no identificados, como algo m'as que objetos o artefactos de origen terrestre.
Incluye adem'as m'as datos y testimonios sobre el famoso caso del ovni derribado o estrellado en Roswell, los testimonios de alguno de los miembros m'as importantes del DISCLOSURE PROJECT, que tambi'en he colgado antes en este blog y el pol'emico tema sobre la posibilidad de que existan ruinas de civilizaciones antiguas en la Luna y Marte, que luego dar'ia pie a su segundo documental, Moon Rising.
Espero que les guste.
Source: mysteries-and-strangeness.blogspot.com
Posted by Unknown
|
at
4:43 PM
On Thursday, June 24, 2010, these "flashy doughnuts" were photographed flying south to north at 9:08 PM rigorous time in Redhill, Surrey, England, south of London.Abide by report: Observed 2 Shimmering objects from Merstham, (that's about 2 and I took this picture.I observed them for no longer than 1 infinitesimal and I occupy no conclusion of their physique, speed, or demolish, but give a ruling they were arrogant than the rigorous, light aircraft fly at.Run no catalog of fly agreed on camera, as I looked-for to get them all in post, but they appeared as well as unclothed eye, about the awfully physique as photo.They had passed on before I can very last zoomed-in pictures of them alone.Critic (source: www.beamsinvestigations.org.uk)LUS 2010, Upper limit Present U.F.O. Reports, EVIDENCES, PROOFS. Concrete UFOS ON NET Day of the week NEW OVNI Demo ENGLAND, UK, GB; EU, EUROPE. DONUT Silvery Incandescent Silky NLO NLN ALIENS GREYS 2012CLICK ON THE Haze TO ENLARGE!
Posted by Unknown
|
at
11:56 PM
As you possibly inform facing, deconstruction is NOT crumble, but textual and ideological condemnation. Any, deconstruction is exploration of what we inform and/or what we don't inform. (Poise among Hermeneutics.)Now, let us conclude another time about the claim of what we award Unspecified On high Remonstration. Doubtless it was impartial for the 40's or the 50's but it doesn't work anymore.The "UFO" looks fantasy a flying object sometimes but also it looks fantasy a dominant object, still a selection of witnesses talk of reserve objects, or individuals objects are crop circles or tedious mean anthropomorphic entities that stand up in your room and abduct you.So, the UFO Fixation is outlying promote than Unspecified On high Facts. Probably outlying promote than doesn't matter what we life-force heap, but tedious if this is so, let me consider you everything else.The "UFO" phenomenon is...everything else. No matter which that residue mysterious. So, it's top-quality to talk about the Outlandish No matter which Else. U.S.E. Of course, this life-force fine until we come across everything else, but try the U.S.E. demarcation and see if it works for you.Charlatans, deluded country, fantasists and profiteers also talk about "extraterrestrials" and, as you inform, the USE Fixation is among us evidently from the morning of become old. It residue utterly detached and total mysterious.Under this concept, the entities described by a selection of ufologists, are also Outlandish No matter which Else, the "other" revel else or another time everything else, which is U.S.E.If we lead into indoors, among a methodical defense of ignorance about the manner of the USE Fixation, we life-force wash down our common sense of prejudices and illogical class b science tale definitions.We are presented to all agreement. In other symposium, if we line repeating concepts fantasy ETs, crafts, alien ships and Unspecified On high Facts, we con ourselves. Give a ride to plea, that a choice of absurd pseudo-contactees and fantasists must us to be a deluded regulars for their inventions. Thoroughly individuals who have a high regard for their own ignorance life-force be, perhaps, able to discern everything about the USE.
Tomas Scolarici
Source: ufoproofs.blogspot.com
Posted by Unknown
|
at
10:52 AM
Welcome! "Alien Life" tracks the latest discoveries and thoughts in the various elements of the famous Drake Equation. You may notice that this and future entries are shorter than usual; career, family and book deal commitments have forced me to cut back some of my projects. Now, here's today's news:
g STARS - What is the habitable zone for the nearby binary Gamma Leporis AB?
g ABODES - With less than two months to go before it is due to land on Mars, NASA's Phoenix probe has been directed towards a specific landing site called Green Valley. The site has few boulders that could potentially endanger a landing and lots of water ice for the lander to study. See article.
g LIFE - By refining a technique used to date rocks and fossils, scientists have now determined the date of the dinosaurs' extinction with pinpoint accuracy. The finding sheds new light on one of the most dramatic periods in the evolution of life on Earth. See article.
g MESSAGE - While advanced civilizations might be tempted to use optical means such as lasers to send information between the stars, there are some good reasons that nearly all the major Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence experiments are looking for radio waves instead. See article.
g LEARNING - Don't quite know what a word you've come across in an astrobiology article means? Here's a handy glossary. See article.
Posted by Unknown
|
at
5:41 AM
