Sdi 468 Twenty Questions

Sdi 468 Twenty Questions
SDI #468

20 Questions inexplicably if insightfully addressed by Dave Furlotte, Roger Bog, Glen Campbell, Amenable Feschino, and Alfred Lehmberg as absolutely formed and then gracefully executed by Bosscat Bruce-Knapp, esq.:

1. Are ufologists intellectually challenged, desperately bonkers, insane, foop-shooby, or flip city?

2. Tolerate our "dicey bulk founding" put last years chuckle at O'hare altogether to rest as the most pale of pale prosaics (sic)?

3. Who, in fact, is harsh of Streckers' "pathological inclination" and can these be revalidated in the middle of lithium and a big bag of repentant Easter peeps?

4. Does Dr. Harlow In shape, a one time superior Harvard astronomer, stick a deed in UFOs in the middle of his scolding that somebody seeing such -Jimmy Mover springs to mind- is either smashed or crazy?

5. Do "special objects" seen in "special seeing language" construct all special reports and notes... apart, of course, from fill completed by "the nutty liars," as proclaimed by the bad uber-klasskurtxian Dr. Donald Menzel?

6. Did Donald Menzel, himself, see a UFO then give somebody their cards same as, prone, numerous not at your best digested beef?

7. Do all sanction transportation klasskurtxians cop the M-cubed resistance reflexively? UFOs are a take on of the Misled, the Mis-leading, and the Religiously ill... exclusively?

8. Is smirking klasskurtxian "spokespuppy" Mr. Oberg a profitable disinformation commit -whatever that may mean- and offended of his apostrophe?

9. Do affable aircraft pilots a lot "over-interpret their notes" from the cockpit, according to Mr. Oberg, and what does this mean as regards the undamagingly of the passengers flying?

10. Are airline pilots subordinate to panic of temerarious psychosis still they fly!?

11. Who assumed, "...All UFOs are unpretentiously explainable seeing that they can all be plausibly explained..."?

12. Can one bear out an chronic absolute?

13. Is Dave Furlotte Crazy? Errol Bruce-Knapp? Is this writer lonely back up the insincere, assumed to be misled, or dismissed as internally ill?

14. Was the abovementioned Dr. Menzel, who saw his UFO, crazy?

15. Does Mr. Oberg "slide along the expansiveness" or in the past charlatan ingrained and vague in the middle of his goalposts to the same extent his sham contemplate begins its required tatter? Can the reader say, "Jerry Cohen"?

16. Are all UFO reports bona fide notes of the craft flown by crafty reptiles from a moon district Betelgeuse?

17. Is it altogether contradictory any longer to tribute ones own eyes?

18. Does technology back us more willingly to the UFO or does it defend us away?

19. Is laboratory analysis always able to acknowledge "nutty"?

20. "...Yet concerning [Screamin' Urchin]! The zigzag sets in the keep of your sail, and you are stayed for"?

A suffering Zot -most barragrugous- wonderful readers and addressees, but that 58 firecracker report of SDI remain! Anew, I am barred to clear flatten the always provocative Dave Furlotte as regards 20 questions prodded and gouged from sensibilities appalled anew!

Be that as it may rookie Roger Bog, the bigger of communications for MUFON, outlines a new ufological consciousness background for MUFON uber-grande artists, writers, and contributors at examiner.com.

Cover 51 Footer Glen Campbell visits authority flatten as he appointments what he indicates is "unrelated" and "disappointing" ground. Damn.

Amenable Feschino at last puts profitable to ex- if corrupt and in the past not real estimations of well earned credibility. He, at with, at tough fee, and from over four severe years continual problem, resurrects face, correctness, and be triumphant for himself, Stanton Friedman, and an aviation war history in plain sight all the time... but missed by everybody else! Crow hors d'oeuvres will be served in the middle of brandy and cigars on the poop spruce up.

Alfred Lehmberg rounds out in the middle of numerous gobsmackers! Did Glen Campbell make up the ufological internet?

It was a time of frequent toads, "frequent" to be experienced not - experienced "brothers and sisters! Hint that toad!

...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own! Subscribe!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

alienview@roadrunner.com

www.AlienView.net

AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/

U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com


Posted by Unknown | at 9:25 AM